The Justice Of Distributions And Its Impact On The...

There are many different approaches to the justice of distributions in societies and there are arguments that can be made to support each of them. Three types of approaches are distribution justice based on a distributive approach that was introduced by John Rawls, emergent which was advocated by Robert Nozick and a market democratic hybrid supported by Tomasi. This paper will illustrate the basic premise of each of these approaches and the impacts that they have on the economics of a society. After briefly explaining these three approaches to just distribution I will demonstrate why Tomasi s Free Market Fairness, or the democratic hybrid approach, is the most logical and productive way to achieve justice of distributions while having a†¦show more content†¦Basic liberties included things such as freedom of speech and due process of law. He specifically pointed out that the right to own a â€Å"means of production† or business and the right to wealth were not a basic liberty. Rawls second principle dealt with the issue of equality and keeping things fair amongst individuals in the society. He admitted that a society could not exist without inequalities among the people due to individual characteristics such as a person s drive or motivation, social class and luck. To adjust to these uncontrollable facts Rawls second principle proclaimed, â€Å"Social and economic inequalities are to satisfy two conditions: â€Å"first, they are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity; and second, they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society (the Difference Principle)† (Rawls, 63). This meant that there needed to be fair and equal opportunity for all to obtain the best jobs in the public and private sector of society. It also meant that education needed to be accessible for all people. He also made clear that the lower class of society or the ones with the l east advantages should be compensated or concessions should be made for them in the quest for fairness. In other words economic inequalities were ok if they benefited society and especially the ones with the least advantages. Rawls concentrated on the